Side by side
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line vs Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat
Same body type (large suv) — comparable price, specs and features.
- high-speed cruising matters (200 km/h top speed)
- you'd rather save ฿709,000 for similar specs
- you need the longer real-world range (122 km more)
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line
- Value15
- Range61
- Cost to own19
- Charging47
- Performance39
EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat
- Value26
- Range93
- Cost to own23
- Charging75
- Performance59
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat costs about ฿7,333/mo less to own — roughly ฿440,011 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat is cheaper — ฿709,000 less than the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line at current prices.
Which has more range, the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat has the longer WLTP range — 122 km more than the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line.
Which charges faster, the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 250 kW.
Which is quicker, the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro S line or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
