Side by side
BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport vs Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon
Same body type (sedan) — comparable price, specs and features.
- you need the longer real-world range (115 km more)
- the quicker 0–100 (2.78 s) matters
- you charge on the road often (350 kW DC peak)
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport
- Value10
- Range87
- Cost to own7
- Charging60
- Performance73
Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon
- Value6
- Range56
- Cost to own5
- Charging92
- Performance96
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Near-identical to own — within a rounding error of each other per month.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport is cheaper — ฿41,000 less than the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon at current prices.
Which has more range, the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport has the longer WLTP range — 115 km more than the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon.
Which charges faster, the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 350 kW.
Which is quicker, the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
