Side by side
Audi e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro vs Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon
Same body type (sedan) — comparable price, specs and features.
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
- you'd rather save ฿2,200,000 for similar specs
- the quicker 0–100 (2.78 s) matters
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro
- Value2
- Range48
- Cost to own3
- Charging79
- Performance93
Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon
- Value6
- Range56
- Cost to own5
- Charging92
- Performance96
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon costs about ฿22,194/mo less to own — roughly ฿1,331,619 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Audi e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon is cheaper — ฿2,200,000 less than the Audi e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro at current prices.
Which has more range, the Audi e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon has the longer WLTP range — 13 km more than the Audi e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro.
Which charges faster, the Audi e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 350 kW.
Which is quicker, the Audi e-tron GT RS e-tron GT Quattro or the Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon?
The Lotus Emeya Emeya 900 Sport Carbon is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
