Side by side
Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro vs BMW i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport
Same body type (sedan) — comparable price, specs and features.




- you'd rather save ฿900,000 for similar specs
- the quicker 0–100 (3.9 s) matters
- you need the longer real-world range (52 km more)
- headroom matters — 18.1 kWh more battery
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro
- Value20
- Range96
- Cost to own16
- Charging79
- Performance85
i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport
- Value17
- Range98
- Cost to own13
- Charging76
- Performance64
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro costs about ฿9,311/mo less to own — roughly ฿558,662 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro or the BMW i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport?
The Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro is cheaper — ฿900,000 less than the BMW i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport at current prices.
Which has more range, the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro or the BMW i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport?
The BMW i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport has the longer rated range — 52 km more than the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro.
Which charges faster, the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro or the BMW i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport?
The Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 270 kW.
Which is quicker, the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro or the BMW i7 i7 50 xDrive M Sport?
The Audi S6 Sportback e-tron S6 Sportback e-tron quattro is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
