Side by side
BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD) vs Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD
Same body type (sedan) — comparable price, specs and features.
- you need the longer real-world range (80 km more)
- you'd rather save ฿499,100 for similar specs
- the quicker 0–100 (2.7 s) matters
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD)
- Value31
- Range90
- Cost to own27
- Charging68
- Performance55
Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD
- Value32
- Range72
- Cost to own29
- Charging100
- Performance96
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD costs about ฿4,353/mo less to own — roughly ฿261,175 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD) or the Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD?
The Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD is cheaper — ฿499,100 less than the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD) at current prices.
Which has more range, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD) or the Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD?
The BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD) has the longer rated range — 80 km more than the Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD.
Which charges faster, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD) or the Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD?
The Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 1500 kW.
Which is quicker, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport (CKD) or the Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD?
The Denza Z9GT Z9GT Performance AWD is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
