Side by side
BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) vs Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+
Same body type (sedan) — comparable price, specs and features.
- you'd rather save ฿291,000 for similar specs
- you need the longer real-world range (56 km more)
- the quicker 0–100 (3.5 s) matters
- headroom matters — 6.2 kWh more battery
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU)
- Value22
- Range83
- Cost to own22
- Charging67
- Performance55
EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+
- Value18
- Range67
- Cost to own21
- Charging57
- Performance91
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) costs about ฿3,199/mo less to own — roughly ฿191,936 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) or the Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+?
The BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) is cheaper — ฿291,000 less than the Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ at current prices.
Which has more range, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) or the Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+?
The BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) has the longer WLTP range — 56 km more than the Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+.
Which charges faster, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) or the Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+?
The BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 205 kW.
Which is quicker, the BMW i5 i5 eDrive40 M Sport Inspiring (CBU) or the Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+?
The Mercedes-Benz EQE Saloon Mercedes-AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
