Side by side
BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport vs Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat
Same body type (mid suv) — comparable price, specs and features.




- you'd rather save ฿691,000 for similar specs
- you need the longer real-world range (178 km more)
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport
- Value40
- Range100
- Cost to own26
- Charging95
- Performance69
EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat
- Value26
- Range90
- Cost to own23
- Charging76
- Performance58
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport costs about ฿7,332/mo less to own — roughly ฿439,906 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport is cheaper — ฿691,000 less than the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat at current prices.
Which has more range, the BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport has the longer rated range — 178 km more than the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat.
Which charges faster, the BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 400 kW.
Which is quicker, the BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport or the Volvo EX90 Plus Twin Motor 7-seat?
The BMW iX3 iX3 50 xDrive M Sport is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.