Side by side
Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive vs Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor
Same body type (compact suv) — comparable price, specs and features.
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
- you'd rather save ฿500,000 for similar specs
- you need the longer real-world range (44 km more)
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
EQA EQA 250 Progressive
- Value37
- Range67
- Cost to own36
- Charging32
- Performance15
EC40 Ultra Single Motor
- Value51
- Range80
- Cost to own44
- Charging47
- Performance32
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor costs about ฿5,214/mo less to own — roughly ฿312,885 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor?
The Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor is cheaper — ฿500,000 less than the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive at current prices.
Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor?
The Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor has the longer WLTP range — 44 km more than the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive.
Which charges faster, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor?
The Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 150 kW.
Which is quicker, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor?
The Volvo EC40 Ultra Single Motor is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
