Side by side
Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive vs Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor
Same body type (compact suv) — comparable price, specs and features.
- you'd rather save ฿300,000 for similar specs
- the quicker 0–100 (4.7 s) matters
- you charge on the road often (200 kW DC peak)
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
EQA EQA 250 Progressive
- Value37
- Range67
- Cost to own36
- Charging32
- Performance15
EC40 Ultra Twin Motor
- Value34
- Range74
- Cost to own32
- Charging65
- Performance73
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive costs about ฿3,194/mo less to own — roughly ฿191,641 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor?
The Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive is cheaper — ฿300,000 less than the Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor at current prices.
Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor?
The Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor has the longer WLTP range — 22 km more than the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive.
Which charges faster, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor?
The Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 200 kW.
Which is quicker, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor?
The Volvo EC40 Ultra Twin Motor is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
