Side by side
Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive vs Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition
Same body type (compact suv) — comparable price, specs and features.
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
- you'd rather save ฿100,000 for similar specs
- the quicker 0–100 (4.8 s) matters
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
EQA EQA 250 Progressive
- Value37
- Range67
- Cost to own36
- Charging32
- Performance15
EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition
- Value40
- Range71
- Cost to own38
- Charging65
- Performance72
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition costs about ฿861/mo less to own — roughly ฿51,659 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition?
The Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition is cheaper — ฿100,000 less than the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive at current prices.
Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition?
The Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition has the longer WLTP range — 9 km more than the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive.
Which charges faster, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition?
The Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 200 kW.
Which is quicker, the Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA 250 Progressive or the Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition?
The Volvo EX40 Ultra Twin Motor Black Edition is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
