Side by side
Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic vs Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range
Same body type (compact suv) — comparable price, specs and features.
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
- you need the longer real-world range (75 km more)
- the quicker 0–100 (5.3 s) matters
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
Aceman Aceman SE Classic
- Value42
- Range31
- Cost to own51
- Charging27
- Performance38
EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range
- Value49
- Range52
- Cost to own50
- Charging51
- Performance66
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic costs about ฿7,748/mo less to own — roughly ฿464,863 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic or the Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range?
The Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic is cheaper — ฿35,000 less than the Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range at current prices.
Which has more range, the Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic or the Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range?
The Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range has the longer WLTP range — 75 km more than the Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic.
Which charges faster, the Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic or the Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range?
The Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 153 kW.
Which is quicker, the Mini Aceman Aceman SE Classic or the Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range?
The Volvo EX30 Ultra Single Motor Extended Range is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
