Side by side
Neta Neta V V-II Smart (current — fire-sale equivalent) vs Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro
Same body type (hatchback) — comparable price, specs and features.
- you'd rather save ฿70,000 for similar specs
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
Neta V V-II Smart (current — fire-sale equivalent)
- Value100
- Range5
- Cost to own99
- Charging2
- Performance4
Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro
- Value99
- Range14
- Cost to own98
- Charging5
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro costs about ฿747/mo less to own — roughly ฿44,785 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Neta Neta V V-II Smart (current — fire-sale equivalent) or the Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro?
The Neta Neta V V-II Smart (current — fire-sale equivalent) is cheaper — ฿70,000 less than the Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro at current prices.
Which has more range, the Neta Neta V V-II Smart (current — fire-sale equivalent) or the Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro?
The Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro has the longer WLTP range — 35 km more than the Neta Neta V V-II Smart (current — fire-sale equivalent).
Which charges faster, the Neta Neta V V-II Smart (current — fire-sale equivalent) or the Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro?
The Wuling Bingo EV Bingo EV Pro charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 50 kW.