Side by side
Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance vs BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport
Same body type (sedan) — comparable price, specs and features.
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
- you'd rather save ฿300,000 for similar specs
- you need the longer real-world range (112 km more)
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance
- Value7
- Range54
- Cost to own8
- Charging80
- Performance83
i7 eDrive50 M Sport
- Value11
- Range86
- Cost to own9
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport costs about ฿3,246/mo less to own — roughly ฿194,785 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance or the BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport?
The BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport is cheaper — ฿300,000 less than the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance at current prices.
Which has more range, the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance or the BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport?
The BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport has the longer WLTP range — 112 km more than the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance.
