Side by side
Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance vs BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport
Same body type (sedan) — comparable price, specs and features.
- you'd rather save ฿700,000 for similar specs
- the quicker 0–100 (4.1 s) matters
- you need the longer real-world range (112 km more)
- headroom matters — 12.3 kWh more battery
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance
- Value8
- Range56
- Cost to own10
- Charging79
- Performance83
i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport
- Value10
- Range87
- Cost to own7
- Charging60
- Performance73
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance costs about ฿7,022/mo less to own — roughly ฿421,340 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance or the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport?
The Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance is cheaper — ฿700,000 less than the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport at current prices.
Which has more range, the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance or the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport?
The BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport has the longer WLTP range — 112 km more than the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance.
Which charges faster, the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance or the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport?
The Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 270 kW.
Which is quicker, the Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance or the BMW i7 i7 xDrive60 M Sport?
The Audi e-tron GT e-tron GT Quattro Performance is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
