Side by side
Neta Neta X Comfort 401 vs Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift)
Same body type (compact suv) — comparable price, specs and features.
neither side has a clear edge on the headline numbers — feature differences and feel are the tiebreakers.
- you'd rather save ฿90,000 for similar specs
- the quicker 0–100 (7.2 s) matters
▸ Where they differ
▸ evchu Score
Neta X Comfort 401
- Value76
- Range7
- Cost to own85
- Charging16
- Performance8
C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift)
- Value88
- Range12
- Cost to own89
- Charging34
- Performance38
All-in ฿/month over 5 years — purchase minus resale, plus charging, insurance, tax and upkeep.
Over 5 years the Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift) costs about ฿954/mo less to own — roughly ฿57,216 cheaper all-in.
Estimate: 15,000 km/yr, charged mostly at home. Resale from used-market data where available, else a conservative segment estimate.
▸ Common questions
Which is cheaper, the Neta Neta X Comfort 401 or the Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift)?
The Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift) is cheaper — ฿90,000 less than the Neta Neta X Comfort 401 at current prices.
Which has more range, the Neta Neta X Comfort 401 or the Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift)?
The Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift) has the longer WLTP range — 16 km more than the Neta Neta X Comfort 401.
Which charges faster, the Neta Neta X Comfort 401 or the Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift)?
The Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift) charges faster, with DC fast charging at up to 110 kW.
Which is quicker, the Neta Neta X Comfort 401 or the Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift)?
The Omoda C5 EV C5 EV Max Plus (CKD facelift) is quicker, with the faster 0–100 km/h time.
